Fantasy Romance
Rohan was right.
The woman inside was not his daughter. Had never been his daughter.
Where was Elise?
Where had they buried his little girl?
A sickening thought wormed through his stomach.
What if Rohan was right again and she was still alive, hurt, and all alone?
The king began to run.
Despite his better judgement, his advisers’ suggestions, and his own wife’s wishes, the king allowed his daughter’s grave to be disturbed.
They had to take great care given the poison, but he had to lay Rohan’s doubts to rest.
And, he had to lay to rest his own.
When they opened the coffin, the king closed his eyes and turned away.
By the gods, what had he done?
What is a knight? Most of us picture a man clad in heavy armor, similar to this:
But, as with many things, our general perception doesn’t encapsulate the entire truth.
I did a bit of research on historical knights so I’d know what they were and could borrow from reality and legend to create the knights in my own work.
In reality, a knight was usually a mounted soldier serving under a feudal lord in Europe. The concept of what a knight was would come to mean men, usually of noble birth (but not required), who would be apprenticed as first a page and then a squire.
During this apprenticeship, they were taught all of the skills necessary to be a skilled fighter, as well as religion, reading and writing, and social decorum. They’d then be given the military rank of knight and be bound to the code of chivalry.
This code of chivalry was enacted partially to control behavior. Because history has taught us how well behaved soldiers can be. See also, Vikings.
Unlike many other titles (duke, baron, etc.), knighthood was not hereditary. It was given to a person by a sovereign because of personal merit or service. This means that it was easier for men who were good at being soldiers to move up in rank. It also meant you never had a six-year-old knight. Unlike some kings. And helped reduce the crazy, unlike in kings.
Knights were an important part of feudal system established by Charlemagne. Under this system, the king owned all of the land, and he granted fiefs to various lords in return for loyalty, protection and service.
In order to provide this protection, the knight class was created. Many knights were professional warriors, and the lord they served paid them for the services, and provided food, lodging, armor, weapons and horses.
Knighthood was a way for a man to advance in a society that offered few other means. As it also wasn’t an inherited position, it was a way for a younger son of a lord to advance himself. Knights could make fortunes from their service, and they could be granted land from the king and become a lord in their own right.
While many of us think of Knights of the Round Table when we think of knights.
In reality, knights were experienced mounted soldiers. They were also supposed to have a firm grounding in religion, among other things, but the reality was knights were about as religious as any other general order of soldiers.
Stories of knights have been told for a very long time. I think it somewhat relates to the legends of King Arthur, but I also think seeing men riding in armor on horseback left a strong impression. It was story worthy.
How about you? What do you think of when you think of knights? Maybe Sir Lancelot or Sir Galahad from King Arthur’s court? Ser Bronn from Game of Thrones? Sir El Cid of Spain? Or maybe you think of something all together different?
Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
When I first picked this up, I was expecting a more fantasy setting. It’s set partially in our world and partially in the Shadowlands, but the Shadowlands are not fleshed out very well. Sort of a shadowy place filled with Goblins, and while it says all Goblins were once human, it is not entirely clear to me how they get to the Shadowlands or how they go about hoarding gold while there.
Disappointed that this wasn’t more fantasy, but overall, an okay read. Just don’t think too deeply.
The story has an interesting premise. A king and his most loyal men are cursed by a druid who believes his king sold out their people to the Romans. The Goblin King must break the curse before he loses his soul and becomes a true Goblin.
Overall, think Beauty and the Beast, but the Beast is a Goblin King who has always been a good man rather than having to be taught that by being a Beast.
Pros
Cons
While I love the fact none of the plot points dragged on, making things a little tougher on the characters would have allowed a resolution to the story shortly after the horrible fiancée and the druid were dealt with. Once these two were both taken care of, I was surprised I still had 1/4 or so of the book to go. All the main points of conflict, except the curse, had been resolved.
This remaining 1/4 is a lot of characters being sad while they no longer have any avenues to find a cure. Would have much rather let the main plot take longer (and maybe a bit more to the steamy scenes) with a resolution shortly after what I had expected to be a climactic final battle.
I mean, after Gaston falls to his death, you’re not looking at another 20 minutes of Belle and Beast bemoaning how there is no cure for him while they hang around and do nothing other than wait for him die.